Dependent variable: CVT incidence (0/1) | (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Turnover 1 (TO1) | 0.978*** | 0.983*** | 0.986** | 0.981*** | 1.000 | 0.977*** |
(In %) | (0.005) | (0.006) | (0.006) | (0.006) | (0.012) | (0.008) |
Turnover 2 | 1.000 | 0.997 | 0.985 | 1.066 | 1.062 | 1.065 |
(In %) | (0.019) | (0.026) | (0.026) | (0.062) | (0.061) | (0.061) |
CVT to reduce turnover | 1.661 | |||||
(see Table notes) | (0.622) | |||||
TO1 X CVT to reduce turnover | 1.034 | |||||
(Interaction term) | (0.0251) | |||||
Collective labor agreement | 0.754 | 0.642 | 0.674 | 0.688 | ||
(0 = no, 1 = yes) | (0.187) | (0.217) | (0.225) | (0.237) | ||
Worker representation | 1.916* | 1.529 | 1.476 | 1.426 | ||
(0 = no, 1 = yes) | (0.690) | (0.814) | (0.785) | (0.733) | ||
Innovativeness | 0,888 | 0.770 | 0.773 | 0.724 | ||
(0 = low, 1 = high) | (0.214) | (0.237) | (0.239) | (0.220) | ||
R + D activities | 0.615 | 0.907 | 0.854 | 0.896 | ||
(0 = no, 1 = yes) | (0.194) | (0.397) | (0.379) | (0.405) | ||
Demands on workers | 0.489*** | 0.462** | 0.449** | 0.451** | ||
(−1 = increasing, 0 = stable, 1 = decreasing) | (0.125) | (0.146) | (0.143) | (0.141) | ||
Qualification structure | 0.591** | 0.406*** | 0.574 | 0.418** | ||
(1 = employment of workers w/o degree, 0) | (0.151) | (0.136) | (0.224) | (0.142) | ||
TO1 X qualification structure | 0.966** | |||||
(Interaction term) | (0.0157) | |||||
Wages | 1.007 | 1.058 | 0.998 | |||
(logged) | (0.322) | (0.340) | (0.317) | |||
CVT professionalism | 2.230** | 2.262** | 2.004** | |||
(0 = low, 1 = high) | (0.710) | (0.725) | (0.641) | |||
Training funds receipts | 43.43*** | 50.13*** | 40.90*** | |||
(0 = no, 1 = yes) | (58.26) | (68.11) | (56.33) | |||
Payback clauses | 1.626 | 1.678* | 1.548 | |||
(0 = no, 1 = yes) | (0.503) | (0.520) | (0.482) | |||
CVT agreements | 1.179 | 1.180 | 1.272 | |||
(0 = no, 1 = yes) | (1.065) | (1.062) | (1.166) | |||
Recognition of externalities | 0.478** | 0.466** | 0.465** | |||
(Self-reported; 0 = no, 1 = yes) | (0.172) | (0.169) | (0.172) | |||
Sensitivity to risk of turnover | 1.120 | 1.119 | 1.095 | |||
(Self-reported; 0 = no, 1 = yes) | (0.340) | (0.339) | (0.332) | |||
Industrial agglomeration | 0.974 | 1.155 | 1.664 | 1.643 | 1.712 | |
(0 = no, 1 = yes) | (0.243) | (0.304) | (0.588) | (0.579) | (0.615) | |
Metropolitan distance | 0.600** | 0.572** | 0.590 | 0.566* | 0.561* | |
(0 = up to 50 km, 1 = more than 50 km) | (0.152) | (0.150) | (0.194) | (0.188) | (0.185) | |
Firm size (ref. 5–9 Besch.) | ||||||
10-49 employees | 1.069 | 1.116 | 0.690 | 0.686 | 0.690 | |
(0.235) | (0.253) | (0.205) | (0.205) | (0.204) | ||
50-249 employees | 3.533*** | 3.375*** | 2.653** | 2.610* | 2.613* | |
(1.078) | (1.183) | (1.306) | (1.320) | (1.291) | ||
250 or more employees | 7.910*** | 8.081*** | 3.824** | 3.921** | 4.007** | |
(2.779) | (3.708) | (2.401) | (2.514) | (2.549) | ||
Industry controls | NO | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES |
Region controls | NO | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES |
Constant | 3.434*** | 1.103 | 3.686 | 29.49 | 18.89 | 43.41 |
(0.407) | (0.949) | (3.767) | (104.8) | (67.31) | (154.8) | |
N | 1,206 | 1,199 | 1,190 | 1,047 | 1047 | 1041 |
Pseudo-R2 | 0.024 | 0.135 | 0.161 | 0.228 | 0.235 | 0.243 |