Table 3 Percentage scores for 2010 and 2012, RLG and statistical significance of the difference between the two years, separated by groups of students and by the parts of the test
Group | Part | 2010 | 2012 | RLG | Significance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Year 0 | MR | 60.0 | 70.1 | 29.3% | t[40] =−3.32, p =.002 |
PF | 61.3 | 73.9 | 30.7% | t[40] =−3.26, p =.000 | |
OP | 63.0 | 67.9 | 20.6% | t[40] =−1.27, p =.21 | |
all | 60.9 | 71.4 | 27.4% | t[40] =−6.11, p =.000 | |
Year 1 | MR | 60.6 | 71.8 | 27.5% | t[69] = −5.53, p =.000 |
PF | 68.8 | 76.4 | 27.4% | t[69] =−5.31, p =.000 | |
OP | 61.0 | 69.8 | 25.6% | t[69] =−3.54, p =.001 | |
all | 63.9 | 73.4 | 25.8% | t[69] =−7.60, p =.000 | |
Year 0 and 1 | MR | 60.4 | 71.2 | 28.2% | t[110] =−6.37, p =.000 |
PF | 66.0 | 75.5 | 28.7% | t[110] =−8.19, p =.000 | |
OP | 61.7 | 69.1 | 23.8% | t[110] =−3.49, p =.001 | |
all | 62.8 | 72.6 | 26.4% | t[110] =−9.79, p =.000 |