Skip to main content

Table 2 Number of items, scale minimum and maximum, means, standard deviations and internal consistency of the measurements on each occasion

From: Determinants of competence development in accounting in upper secondary education

Predictor

n/min–max

t0 (N = 411)

t1 (N = 390)

t2 (N = 349)

t3 (N = 318)

M/SD/α

M/SD/α

M/SD/α

M/SD/α

Student cognitive ability

 Accounting comp. (wbb)

t1: 53, t2–3: 34/−∞ to +∞

−0.44/1.14/0.91

0.49/0.80/0.80

0.46/1.98/0.85 a

 Grades (grades)

4 (t0: 3)/1–5

2.87/0.96/0.76

2.74/0.80/0.69

2.89/0.81/0.75

 

 Maths ability (Maths)

40/0–75

51.39/10.76/0.79

   

Student self-concept

 Academic self-concept (asc)

11/1–4

2.37/0.45/0.80

 

2.38/0.53/0.83

2.43/0.51/0.83

 Student learning strategies

     

 Critical understanding (crt)

4/1–6

14.62/3.82/0.70

 

14.21/3.78/0.65

14.28/3.91/0.70

 Establishing cognitive (eci)

4/1–6

15.75/3.76/0.69

 

14.98/3.82/0.61

14.81/3.87/0.67

 Summarizing and material (sas)

4/1–6

15.24/4.62/0.81

 

15.38/5.13/0.84

15.87/5.51/0.89

 Time management (time)

4/1–6

14.55/5.22/0.87

 

13.06/5.37/0.86

12.89/5.20/0.86

 Social learning support (socs)

4/1–6

15.86/3.42/0.62

 

16.13/3.58/0.62

16.14/3.59/0.66

Student motivational char.

 Intrinsic Regulation (intr)

5/1–5

 

2.59/1.00/0.90

2.46/0.99/0.90

2.57/1.03/0.93

 Identified Regulation (ident)

4/1–5

 

3.70/0.95/0.85

3.62/1.07/0.89

3.65/1.02/0.85

 Introjected Regulation (intro)

4/1–5

 

2.73/0.89/0.70

2.77/0.88/0.70

2.83/0.91/0.72

 Extrinsic Regulation (extr)

4/1–5

 

3.06/0.84/0.64

3.10/0.83/0.64

3.02/0.78/0.59

 School satisfaction (ssat)

1/1–4

3.64/0.53/–

3.23/0.71/–

3.15/0.66/–

 

 Willingness for effort (wfeff)

4/1–6

13.53/3.59/0.68

 

12.75/3.77/0.66

15.44/4.31/0.72

Learning environment char.

 Competence support (comp)

4/1–5

 

2.99/0.94/0.83

3.07/0.92/0.70

3.27/0.92/0.78

 Autonomy support (auto)

5/1–5

 

3.23/0.97/0.86

3.26/1.00/0.86

3.54/1.00/0.88

 Relatedness support (relat)

4/1–5

 

3.15/0.81/0.78

3.68/0.80/0.64

3.79/0.76/0.60

 Structure support (struc)

8/1–5

 

3.43/0.70/0.81

3.58/0.78/0.85

3.74/0.74/0.85

 Classroom management (tol)

3/1–5

 

2.99/0.77/0.73

 

2.63/0.86/0.69

 Cog. act. (ZPD, coak)

2/1–5

 

2.56/1.04/0.64

 

2.57/1.03/0.74

 Cog. act. (understanding, coau)

2/1–5

 

3.67/0.82/0.63

 

3.49/0.85/0.75

 Cog. act. (task analysis, taska)

3/1–5

 

3.80/0.77/0.73

 

3.88/0.86/0.87

  1. With few exceptions (extr, socs, relat) all constructs show acceptable reliability (around or over the conventional cut-off of 0.70, italics). For each learning environment feature (at the bottom of the table), ICC 2 (= between-class variance/(between-class variance + (within-class variance/mean class size))) was calculated as a measure of reliability at the class level: comp 0.81, auto 0.86, relat 0.33, struc 0.79, tol. 91, coak 0.79, coau 0.61, taska 0.59
  2. M mean, SD standard deviation
  3. aDue to school-specific curricula, three different test versions had to be constructed for grades 10 and 11. We report the average Cronbach’s alpha. For further information on psychometric features of the WBB see Helm (in press).