Skip to main content

Table 6 Model 1 (predicting intended track choice with a model including student’s ADG only)

From: Influence of student’s ability to delay gratification on their educational transition choice

Variable

Model I

Model II

OR [95% CI]

AME [95% CI]

OR [95% CI]

AME [95% CI]

ADG

0.77* [0.59, 1.04]

− 0.09* [− 0.21, 0.00]

0.54* [0.61, 1.01]

− 0.08* [− 0.20, 0.00]

SES

  

0.86** [0.76, 0.98]

− 0.13** [− 0.20, − 0.02]

CA

  

0.97** [0.67, 1.44]

− 0.21** [− 0.30, − 0.05]

Gender

  

0.69* [0.51, 0.91]

− 0.05* [− 0.12, 0.00]

Locale

  

0.58* [0.41, 0.76]

− 0.04* [− 0.10, 0.00]

Pseudo R2

0.11***

 

0.51***

 
  1. Model 2 (predicting intended track choice with a model including student’s ADG, SES, CA, gender and locale)
  2. [95% CI]: 95% confidence interval; OR: odds ratio; AME: average marginal effect; ADG: ability to delay gratification; SES: socio-economic status; CA: cognitive ability
  3. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001