| Total | No migrant background | Second-generation migrants | First-generation migrants |
---|---|---|---|---|
Prior achievement | ||||
School-leaving certificate (%) | Â | Â | Â | Â |
No or lower-secondary certificate | 20.2% | 18.7% | 23.2% | 28.4% |
Extended lower-secondary certificate | 13.2% | 11.6% | 16.6% | 21.5% |
Intermediate-secondary certificate | 66.6% | 69.7% | 60.2% | 50.1% |
GPA school-leaving certificate (1 = very good → 6 = insufficient) | 2.6 | 2.6 | 2.7 | 2.8 |
Language abilities and skills: Receptive vocabulary | 54.2 | 56.2 | 49.3 | 47.0 |
Rational choice (university entrance qualification) | ||||
Benefit (B) | 4.8 | 4.8 | 4.8 | 4.8 |
Expected probability (p) | 2.8 | 2.8 | 2.8 | 2.7 |
Importance of upward mobility (UM) | 3.8 | 3.7 | 3.9 | 4.0 |
Probability of upward mobility (c) | 4.7 | 4.7 | 4.7 | 4.7 |
Costs (C) | 1.9 | 1.9 | 1.8 | 2.0 |
Expected probability (p) | 2.8 | 2.8 | 2.8 | 2.7 |
Educational motivation (B + c * UM) | 8.6 | 8.5 | 8.8 | 8.8 |
Investment risk (C/p) | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 1.0 |
Social influence | ||||
Parental educational expectations as perceived by adolescents (% university) | 23.3% | 17.9% | 38.1% | 40.5% |
Share of friends with aspirations for university entrance qualification (1 = none, 2 = almost none, 3 = less than half, 4 = about half, 5 = more than half, 6 = almost all, 7 = all) | 3.3 | 3.3 | 3.4 | 3.2 |
Social origin | ||||
Parents’ highest socioeconomic status (ISEI) | 46.5 | 49.0 | 40.1 | 36.9 |
Parents’ highest education (CASMIN) (%) | ||||
Low | 9.1% | 2.8% | 25.3% | 33.4% |
Intermediate | 81.4% | 86.3% | 69.2% | 61.2% |
High | 9.5% | 10.9% | 5.5% | 5.4% |
Other control variables | ||||
Gender (% female) | 46.9% | 45.9% | 51.4% | 45.1% |
N sample | 5,437 | 4,041 | 1,037 | 359 |
Row percentages | 100.0% | 74.3% | 19.1% | 6.6% |