Skip to main content

Table 3 Gaps in achievement, rational choice, social influence, and social origin between natives and second-generation migrants and between natives and first-generation migrants (Cohen’s d and Cohen’s h)

From: To what extent do secondary effects shape migrants’ educational trajectories after lower-secondary education?

 

Second-generation migrants

First-generation migrants

Diff.1

Cohen’s d or h

Diff.1

Cohen’s d or h

Prior achievement

School-leaving certificate2

    

No or lower-secondary certificate

4.5***

0.1

9.7***

0.2

Extended lower-secondary certificate

5.0***

0.1

9.9***

0.3

Intermediate-secondary certificate

− 9.5***

− 0.2

− 19.6***

− 0.4

GPA on school-leaving certificate (1 = very good → 6 = insufficient)

0.1***

0.2

0.2***

0.3

Language abilities and skills: Receptive vocabulary

− 6.8***

− 0.7

− 9.0***

− 1.0

Rational choice

Educational motivation: university entrance qualification (B + c * UM)

0.3***

0.2

0.3***

0.2

Investment risk: university entrance qualification (C/p)

− 0.1**

− 0.1

0.1

0.1

Social influence

Parental educational expectations as perceived by adolescents (university)2

20.2***

0.5

22.6***

0.6

Share of friends with aspirations for university entrance qualification

0.1*

0.1

− 0.1

− 0.1

Social origin

Parents’ highest socioeconomic status (ISEI)

− 8.9***

− 0.5

− 12.1***

− 0.7

Parents’ highest education (CASMIN)2

    

Low

22.5***

0.7

30.6***

0.9

Intermediate

17.1***

− 0.4

25.1***

− 0.6

High

− 5.4***

− 0.2

− 5.4***

− 0.2

  1. 1Estimated difference of means or proportions (percentage points) based on a t-test
  2. 2For categorical variables Cohen’s h was estimated. Average estimates pooled over 30 imputed data sets. Reference category for all tests were native respondents. Level of significance: ***p < 0.001; **p < 0.01; *p < 0.05. Data: NEPS SC4 SUF 12.0.0, own calculations