Skip to main content

Table 8 Regression models: The influence of OTL on PCK (PVs)

From: The impact of university teacher training on prospective teachers’ CK and PCK – a comparison between Austria and Germany

  Germany Austria
Independent variables B SE β   B SE β  
Control variables         
  Sex (0 male; 1 female) −0.02 0.02 −0.03   −0.07 0.05 −0.11  
  High School GPA (1 to 4; 1 best grade) −0.16 0.02 −0.29 *** −0.10 0.03 −0.26 ***
OTL outside of university education         
  Commercial high school (Dummy; nG = 463; nA = 177) 0.04 0.02 0.06 * 0.02 0.05 0.03  
  Commercial apprenticeship (Dummy; nG = 535; nA = 18) 0.24 0.02 0.39 *** −0.01 0.08 −0.01  
  Internship in accounting (Dummy; nG = 159; nA = 76) 0.06 0.03 0.07 * 0.07 0.04 0.13  
  Internship in school (Dummy; nG = 614; nA = 123) 0.00 0.02 0.01   −0.07 0.04 −0.14  
OTL during university education         
  Major in accounting (Dummy; nG = 128; nA = 67) 0.08 0.03 0.08 ** 0.02 0.05 0.03  
  Courses in accounting didactics (Dummy; nG = 94; nA = 156) 0.10 0.04 0.09 ** −0.08 0.04 −0.14  
  Courses in business didactics (Dummy; nG = 346; nA = 154) 0.05 0.02 0.07 ** 0.01 0.05 0.01  
R2 (adjusted R2) 0.28 (0.27) 0.15 (0.11)
  1. Note: *p < .05; **p < .01; ***p < .001; B unstandardised regression coefficient, β standardised regression coefficient. nG sample Germany; nA sample Austria. The table shows the rounded values.