Tertiary students’ perceptions of hospitality careers in Vietnam

Empirical Research in Vocational Education and Training

Table 6 Summary of logistic regression results, by model, of predictors reporting the student group

#	Dimension/Statement	B (SE)	p	95.0% CI for odds ratio
#	Dimension/Statement	B (SE)	p	Lower	Odds ratio	Upper
Industry-person congeniality
2	Personality well suited jobs	− .61 (.21)	.004	.36	.54	.82
5	Work pleasure	.63 (.21)	.003	1.24	1.87	2.84
7	Pleased to satisfy customers	− .54 (.27)	.042	.34	.58	.98
9	Pleased to serve tourists	− .50 (.21)	.015	.41	.61	.91
Pay/promotion opportunities
4	Satisfactory promotion	.70 (.28)	.011	1.18	2.02	3.46
6	^RExperience-based promotion	.46 (.20)	.023	1.07	1.58	2.35
8	^RInconsistent promotion	.54 (.21)	.009	1.14	1.72	2.58
Commitment
1	^ROutweigh of disadvantages	.69 (.20)	.001	1.34	2.00	2.99
4	Wanting hospitality work after graduation	1.198 (.32)	.000	1.80	3.31	6.10
5	^RNo plan for hospitality work	− .67 (.20)	.001	.35	.51	.76
Co-workers
4	Easy making friend with	− .27(.27)	.000	.17	.28	.48
5	Easy getting along with	.85(.27)	.002	1.38	2.34	3.98
Managers
4	^RWith no hospitality background	.60 (.22)	.006	1.19	1.82	2.78
Social status
3	Family pride	.77 (.21)	.000	1.43	2.16	3.25

R²= .823 (Nagelkerke), .601 (Cox & Snell); Hosmer and Lemeshow test significance p < .001; Classification accuracy = 95.5%; ^R reversed coding item