Matrix of the possible feature space | Perspective of the authors | ||
---|---|---|---|
Acceptance of OA | Dissemination of OA | Use of OA | |
Technical and structural conditions | Clear stipulations are in place regarding rights of use or the licensing model, e.g. on publication platforms. | There are licensing models, which are easy to understand and to apply, and simple to implement technically. | Legal regulations on the further use of publications are also readily comprehensible for non-legal specialists. |
Policy-related and normative conditions | There are clearly understandable licensing models which are easy to apply; Authors can also allocate simple non-exclusive rights of use. | Funding providers stipulate the dissemination of results through OA (e.g. Horizon 2020 funding programme (cf. European Commission (n.d.)); OA guidelines from institutes of higher education regulate and promote the use and dissemination pathways of OA; Requirement to use licence models exist on the part of the infrastructure provider. | Copyright and limitations on copyright are user friendly and provide legal certainty; University repositories have clear legal guidelines which lay claim to a simple non-exclusive right of use the legal conditions of OA repositories thus make them more attractive to academic researchers, rather than imposing any limitations. |
Conditions inherent within the academic research system | Acceptance from the academic research system: Access to results from taxpayer-funded research must be ensured. | Professional academic community favours the dissemination of results through OA and is supported by academic specialist associations; Publishing houses accept content which has already been published and do not demand an exclusive right of use. | Open licensing models facilitate new forms of academic research discourse (“collective knowledge”). |