Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Erratum
  • Open Access

Erratum to: Spatial structure counts: the relevance of regional labour-market conditions for educational transitions to vocational training

Empirical Research in Vocational Education and Training20168:1

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40461-016-0028-x

  • Received: 17 January 2016
  • Accepted: 17 January 2016
  • Published:

The original article was published in Empirical Research in Vocational Education and Training 2015 7:12

Erratum to: Empirical Res Voc Ed Train (2015) 7:12 DOI 10.1186/s40461-015-0024-6

Unfortunately, the original version of this article [1] contained an error. Within the acknowledgements section, “767/6-1” should read “HI 767/7-1”. In addition Table 1 contains some inaccuracies. The correct version of Table 1 can be found below.
Table 1

Discrete time event history model for the transition to vocational training in the dual system after secondary schooling (observed within the first 3 years after school), Data: GSOEP 2012, Federal Labour Office 2014, Federal Statistical Office 2014, own calculations

 

Model 1

Model 2

Model 3

Model 4

Time-specific information

 Baseline 1 year of school leaving (ref. 3rd year after school)

0.082***

(0.015)

0.082***

(0.018)

0.082***

(0.017)

0.081***

(0.018)

 Baseline 2 1st year after school leaving (ref. 3rd year after school)

0.062**

(0.021)

0.062***

(0.024)

0.062***

(0.023)

0.064***

(0.024)

 Baseline 3 2nd year after school leaving (ref. 3rd year after school)

0.015

(0.035)

0.015

(0.039)

0.014

(0.039)

0.017

(0.044)

Unemployment information on regional level (s)

 Unemployment rate (district)

−0.010***

(0.002)

−0.016***

(0.003)

−0.009***

(0.004)

−0.016***

(0.005)

 Average unemployment (1st neighbour districts)

 

−0.008**

(0.004)

−0.017**

(0.002)

−0.013**

(0.004)

 Average unemployment (2nd neighbour districts)

  

0.004

(0.001)

 

Age-specific population information on regional levels (s)

 Change in 15–18 year olds (district)

−0.007***

(0.004)

−0.008**

(0.003)

−0.006*

(0.003)

−0.007*

(0.003)

 Change in 15–18 year olds (1st neighbour district)

 

−0.004

(0.015)

0.001

(0.016)

0.004

(0.021)

 Change in 15–18 year olds (2nd neighbour district)

  

−0.008

(0.006)

 

 Year (1999–2006) (ref. 2007–2011)

−0.119***

(0.023)

−0.119***

(0.022)

−0.119***

(0.022)

−0.117**

(0.022)

Personal information

 Sex (male)

0.117***

(0.016)

0.119***

(0.016)

0.114***

(0.016)

0.114***

(0.017)

 Dropout without certif. (ref. lower sec.)

−0.046*

(0.026)

−0.052**

(0.027)

−0.055

(0.028)

−0.053

(0.028)

 Intermediate secondary certif. (ref. lower sec.)

0.108***

(0.018)

0.107***

(0.017)

0.108***

(0.017)

0.109***

(0.018)

Social and ethnic background information

 Parents have intermediate school degree (ref. no/lower school degree)

0.068***

(0.021)

0.073***

(0.021)

0.078***

(0.021)

0.073***

(0.023)

 Parents have university entrance diploma (ref. no/lower school degree)

−0.130***

(0.022)

−0.129***

(0.021)

−0.127***

(0.024)

−0.127***

(0.025)

 Parents have vocational training degree (ref. no voc. degree)

0.061***

(0.022)

0.063***

(0.021)

0.058**

(0.021)

0.060**

(0.022)

 Parents have university degree (ref. no voc. degree)

0.002

(0.037)

0.000

(0.040)

−0.001

(0.041)

−0.000

(0.041)

 Immigrant background

−0.034***

(0.020)

−0.037**

(0.020)

−0.040**

(0.021)

−0.034**

(0.019)

Interaction terms

 Unempl. home district * Unempl. 1st neighb. district

 

0.001**

(0.000)

0.001*

(0.000)

0.001**

(0.000)

 Unempl. home district * Unempl. 1st neighb. * Unempl. 2nd neighb. district

  

0.000

(0.001)

 

 Unempl. home district * dropout

   

−0.002

(0.001)

 Unempl. home district * intermed. school certif.

   

0.002

(0.002)

 Unempl. 1st neighb. district * dropout

   

0.011

(0.014)

 Unempl. 1st neighb. district * intermed. school certif.

   

0.016**

(0.002)

 Unempl. home district * Unempl.1st neighb. district * dropout

   

0.004

(0.022)

 Unempl. home district * Unempl. 1st neighb. district * intermed. school certif.

   

−0.005*

(0.022)

 (Mc Fadden’s) pseudo R2

0.1547

0.1571

0.1581

0.1688

 LR

1726.07

1783.76

1794.33

1810.38

 N person years (n persons)

3.970

(2.144)

3970

(2144)

3970

(2144)

3970

(2144)

Presented are average marginal effects (AMEs); robust standard errors in parentheses

Significance level: * p < 0.1, ** p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001

Notes

Declarations

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Sociology, University of Tuebingen, Wilhelmstraße 36, 72074 Tuebingen, Germany

Reference

  1. Weßling K, Hartung A, Hillmert S (2015) Spatial structure counts: the relevance of regional labour-market conditions for educational transitions to vocational training. Empi Res Vocat Educ Train. 2(7):12. doi:10.1186/s40461-015-0024-6 View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

Advertisement